Lotto 6/49 Number Frequency Chart

Recency-weighted frequency for all 49 numbers. Recent draws count more than older draws.

Showing data from 300 draws. Recency-weighted: recent draws count more.

Statistics based on official draw history.

Frequency Distribution

1
28 (47.7%)
2
39 (66.2%)
3
38 (57.75%)
4
37 (50.12%)
5
33 (56.36%)
6
29 (50.55%)
7
46 (43.4%)
8
36 (54.86%)
9
43 (99.46%)
10
38 (62.44%)
11
38 (60.15%)
12
34 (46.95%)
13
37 (58.21%)
14
34 (59.54%)
15
40 (85.94%)
16
35 (89.1%)
17
49 (70.8%)
18
40 (44.9%)
19
29 (39.8%)
20
35 (51.86%)
21
32 (71.85%)
22
37 (40.23%)
23
38 (65.27%)
24
29 (73.55%)
25
40 (69.62%)
26
40 (50.29%)
27
33 (42.49%)
28
37 (82.64%)
29
33 (41.25%)
30
38 (64.59%)
31
34 (33.35%)
32
36 (44.68%)
33
33 (58.54%)
34
34 (49.92%)
35
42 (72.2%)
36
35 (54.56%)
37
38 (64.96%)
38
33 (58.39%)
39
49 (90.79%)
40
37 (73.33%)
41
38 (75.36%)
42
43 (68.85%)
43
33 (52.77%)
44
36 (83.05%)
45
37 (78.02%)
46
41 (79.8%)
47
27 (46.66%)
48
37 (60.14%)
49
42 (100%)

Complete Frequency Table

#RawRaw %Weighted
1 28 9.33% 47.7%
2 39 13% 66.2%
3 38 12.67% 57.75%
4 37 12.33% 50.12%
5 33 11% 56.36%
6 29 9.67% 50.55%
7 46 15.33% 43.4%
8 36 12% 54.86%
9 43 14.33% 99.46%
10 38 12.67% 62.44%
11 38 12.67% 60.15%
12 34 11.33% 46.95%
13 37 12.33% 58.21%
14 34 11.33% 59.54%
15 40 13.33% 85.94%
16 35 11.67% 89.1%
17 49 16.33% 70.8%
18 40 13.33% 44.9%
19 29 9.67% 39.8%
20 35 11.67% 51.86%
21 32 10.67% 71.85%
22 37 12.33% 40.23%
23 38 12.67% 65.27%
24 29 9.67% 73.55%
25 40 13.33% 69.62%
26 40 13.33% 50.29%
27 33 11% 42.49%
28 37 12.33% 82.64%
29 33 11% 41.25%
30 38 12.67% 64.59%
31 34 11.33% 33.35%
32 36 12% 44.68%
33 33 11% 58.54%
34 34 11.33% 49.92%
35 42 14% 72.2%
36 35 11.67% 54.56%
37 38 12.67% 64.96%
38 33 11% 58.39%
39 49 16.33% 90.79%
40 37 12.33% 73.33%
41 38 12.67% 75.36%
42 43 14.33% 68.85%
43 33 11% 52.77%
44 36 12% 83.05%
45 37 12.33% 78.02%
46 41 13.67% 79.8%
47 27 9% 46.66%
48 37 12.33% 60.14%
49 42 14% 100%
📖 Learn this metric

Explore how frequency data is tracked across official draws and what it means for number selection. How historical frequency works →