Lotto Max Cold Numbers
Numbers with the weakest recent frequency, ranked by recency-weighted score. Default: last 300 draws.
Données de 300 tirages. Pondéré par la récence : les tirages récents comptent plus.
Statistiques basées sur l'historique officiel des tirages.
Ranked by weighted frequency (lowest first)
| # | Compte brut | Raw % | Score pondéré |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 41 | 13.67% | 34.01% |
| 2 | 44 | 14.67% | 39.61% |
| 8 | 36 | 12% | 40.03% |
| 13 | 35 | 11.67% | 41.15% |
| 27 | 38 | 12.67% | 41.66% |
| 1 | 35 | 11.67% | 43.17% |
| 26 | 38 | 12.67% | 43.31% |
| 20 | 44 | 14.67% | 46.78% |
| 39 | 36 | 12% | 50.2% |
| 10 | 39 | 13% | 50.36% |
| 46 | 43 | 14.33% | 51.48% |
| 29 | 41 | 13.67% | 52.49% |
| 24 | 38 | 12.67% | 54.03% |
| 17 | 33 | 11% | 56.11% |
| 23 | 38 | 12.67% | 57.51% |
| 44 | 41 | 13.67% | 57.83% |
| 42 | 33 | 11% | 58.93% |
| 50 | 44 | 14.67% | 60.41% |
| 47 | 39 | 13% | 60.81% |
| 30 | 45 | 15% | 60.93% |
| 21 | 41 | 13.67% | 61.44% |
| 11 | 37 | 12.33% | 62.51% |
| 5 | 40 | 13.33% | 62.86% |
| 15 | 39 | 13% | 63% |
| 40 | 42 | 14% | 63.73% |
| 14 | 38 | 12.67% | 63.98% |
| 48 | 36 | 12% | 64.57% |
| 38 | 45 | 15% | 65.31% |
| 35 | 38 | 12.67% | 65.86% |
| 16 | 46 | 15.33% | 66.21% |
| 49 | 31 | 10.33% | 66.53% |
| 12 | 44 | 14.67% | 68.49% |
| 9 | 44 | 14.67% | 69.76% |
| 45 | 45 | 15% | 69.86% |
| 4 | 49 | 16.33% | 70.91% |
| 7 | 55 | 18.33% | 72.95% |
| 33 | 42 | 14% | 73.02% |
| 25 | 43 | 14.33% | 73.32% |
| 28 | 47 | 15.67% | 73.76% |
| 32 | 45 | 15% | 75.79% |
| 37 | 39 | 13% | 75.97% |
| 22 | 50 | 16.67% | 77.36% |
| 41 | 40 | 13.33% | 77.4% |
| 18 | 45 | 15% | 81.1% |
| 3 | 47 | 15.67% | 81.39% |
| 36 | 51 | 17% | 81.65% |
| 31 | 46 | 15.33% | 84.63% |
| 43 | 44 | 14.67% | 84.97% |
| 34 | 50 | 16.67% | 91.43% |
| 6 | 53 | 17.67% | 100% |
📖 Learn this metric
Learn why cold numbers appear less frequently and what the gambler's fallacy means for selection. What cold numbers tell you →