Lotto Max Cold Numbers
Numbers with the weakest recent frequency, ranked by recency-weighted score. Default: last 300 draws.
Données de 207 tirages. Pondéré par la récence : les tirages récents comptent plus.
Statistiques basées sur l'historique officiel des tirages.
Ranked by weighted frequency (lowest first)
| # | Compte brut | Raw % | Score pondéré |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 17 | 8.21% | 35.31% |
| 13 | 23 | 11.11% | 36.48% |
| 1 | 22 | 10.63% | 37.28% |
| 15 | 22 | 10.63% | 37.96% |
| 19 | 24 | 11.59% | 38.43% |
| 11 | 25 | 12.08% | 39.86% |
| 17 | 21 | 10.14% | 39.97% |
| 24 | 22 | 10.63% | 43.32% |
| 23 | 21 | 10.14% | 46.18% |
| 2 | 29 | 14.01% | 46.45% |
| 27 | 31 | 14.98% | 48.08% |
| 35 | 27 | 13.04% | 48.09% |
| 12 | 28 | 13.53% | 48.27% |
| 8 | 27 | 13.04% | 48.36% |
| 44 | 28 | 13.53% | 49.64% |
| 47 | 24 | 11.59% | 49.74% |
| 39 | 30 | 14.49% | 51.4% |
| 26 | 26 | 12.56% | 53.07% |
| 40 | 30 | 14.49% | 55.34% |
| 32 | 32 | 15.46% | 55.41% |
| 5 | 32 | 15.46% | 55.93% |
| 46 | 31 | 14.98% | 58.98% |
| 10 | 31 | 14.98% | 60.09% |
| 18 | 30 | 14.49% | 60.72% |
| 33 | 29 | 14.01% | 60.8% |
| 20 | 33 | 15.94% | 61.13% |
| 29 | 31 | 14.98% | 61.14% |
| 14 | 29 | 14.01% | 61.66% |
| 49 | 23 | 11.11% | 63.19% |
| 50 | 34 | 16.43% | 63.98% |
| 41 | 29 | 14.01% | 64.2% |
| 21 | 29 | 14.01% | 64.6% |
| 48 | 27 | 13.04% | 66.03% |
| 16 | 31 | 14.98% | 66.64% |
| 22 | 34 | 16.43% | 69.1% |
| 37 | 26 | 12.56% | 70.5% |
| 25 | 23 | 11.11% | 70.84% |
| 9 | 31 | 14.98% | 72.92% |
| 30 | 32 | 15.46% | 74.33% |
| 4 | 34 | 16.43% | 74.82% |
| 28 | 32 | 15.46% | 75.29% |
| 36 | 34 | 16.43% | 75.59% |
| 43 | 32 | 15.46% | 76.9% |
| 7 | 35 | 16.91% | 77.86% |
| 3 | 33 | 15.94% | 79.18% |
| 38 | 35 | 16.91% | 86.74% |
| 45 | 35 | 16.91% | 86.99% |
| 6 | 37 | 17.87% | 94.52% |
| 34 | 34 | 16.43% | 96.4% |
| 31 | 34 | 16.43% | 100% |
📖 Learn this metric
Learn why cold numbers appear less frequently and what the gambler's fallacy means for selection. What cold numbers tell you →