Lotto Max Cold Numbers
Numbers with the weakest recent frequency, ranked by recency-weighted score. Default: last 300 draws.
Showing data from 207 draws. Recency-weighted: recent draws count more.
Statistics based on official draw history.
Ranked by weighted frequency (lowest first)
| # | Raw Count | Raw % | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 17 | 8.21% | 35.31% |
| 13 | 23 | 11.11% | 36.48% |
| 17 | 21 | 10.14% | 39.97% |
| 24 | 21 | 10.14% | 43.18% |
| 2 | 29 | 14.01% | 46.45% |
| 1 | 23 | 11.11% | 46.53% |
| 15 | 23 | 11.11% | 47.02% |
| 19 | 25 | 12.08% | 47.49% |
| 35 | 26 | 12.56% | 47.95% |
| 27 | 31 | 14.98% | 48.08% |
| 12 | 28 | 13.53% | 48.27% |
| 11 | 26 | 12.56% | 49.1% |
| 44 | 27 | 13.04% | 49.5% |
| 47 | 24 | 11.59% | 49.74% |
| 39 | 30 | 14.49% | 51.4% |
| 26 | 25 | 12.08% | 52.93% |
| 23 | 22 | 10.63% | 55.24% |
| 40 | 30 | 14.49% | 55.34% |
| 5 | 31 | 14.98% | 55.78% |
| 8 | 27 | 13.04% | 57.28% |
| 46 | 29 | 14.01% | 58.7% |
| 10 | 31 | 14.98% | 60.09% |
| 18 | 29 | 14.01% | 60.58% |
| 33 | 29 | 14.01% | 60.8% |
| 14 | 29 | 14.01% | 61.66% |
| 49 | 23 | 11.11% | 63.19% |
| 50 | 33 | 15.94% | 63.84% |
| 41 | 29 | 14.01% | 64.2% |
| 21 | 29 | 14.01% | 64.6% |
| 32 | 33 | 15.94% | 64.65% |
| 48 | 27 | 13.04% | 66.03% |
| 22 | 33 | 15.94% | 68.96% |
| 29 | 32 | 15.46% | 70.2% |
| 20 | 34 | 16.43% | 70.37% |
| 25 | 23 | 11.11% | 70.84% |
| 9 | 31 | 14.98% | 72.92% |
| 30 | 31 | 14.98% | 74.19% |
| 4 | 32 | 15.46% | 74.54% |
| 36 | 34 | 16.43% | 75.59% |
| 16 | 32 | 15.46% | 75.88% |
| 43 | 32 | 15.46% | 76.9% |
| 7 | 35 | 16.91% | 77.86% |
| 37 | 27 | 13.04% | 79.55% |
| 28 | 33 | 15.94% | 84.53% |
| 38 | 35 | 16.91% | 86.74% |
| 3 | 34 | 16.43% | 88.24% |
| 6 | 37 | 17.87% | 94.52% |
| 45 | 36 | 17.39% | 96.24% |
| 34 | 34 | 16.43% | 96.4% |
| 31 | 34 | 16.43% | 100% |
📖 Learn this metric
Learn why cold numbers appear less frequently and what the gambler's fallacy means for selection. What cold numbers tell you →